In these chapters we see a stark contrast between the
crowds’ reaction to Jesus and that of the religious authorities. Funny how
quickly things change. The people greet Jesus as a king upon his entrance to
Jerusalem, placing their cloaks and palm branches along his way. We’re told
that they are spellbound by his teaching (11:18) and that they listen to him with
delight (12:37). The chief priests, scribes and elders, however, challenge his
authority at every turn. The Pharisees question him about paying taxes; the
Sadducees go after him on the topic of resurrection.
To be fair, Jesus gives as good as he gets. He drives the
money changers from the Temple. He questions the scribes’ interpretation of
Scripture and then challenges them outright: “Beware of the scribes…who devour
widows’ houses and for the sake of appearance say long prayers” (12:40). It’s
not accidental that the next story we read is that of “the widow’s mite.” Jesus
watches a poor widow put two small copper coins in the temple treasury – “everything
she had, all she had to live on” (12:44). While Jesus may well be commending
her generosity (vs. those who give out of their abundance), he’s also
commenting on a corrupt system that so devours widows’ houses that this is “all
she had to live on”.
So whose authority is legitimate? Consider what Jesus
uses his authority to do. He tries to restore the temple to its original
purpose as a house of prayer. He calls the disciples to forgiveness. He reminds
the leaders in whose image they were made. Coins are made in the image of the
Emperor; people (yes, even those who challenge him) are made in the image of
God.
Perhaps the most baffling moment in these chapters is
Jesus’ cursing of the fig tree. What did the fig tree do to him? It wasn’t even
the season for figs. Typically, when Mark inserts a story between two connected
stories, the middle story provides a key to interpreting what falls on either
side. In this case, Jesus might be comparing the fig tree to the temple itself.
The temple had grown so corrupted that few, if any, were drawing nourishment
from it. Soon the temple would fall altogether. While the cursing of the fig
tree is a parabolic action (and hence, open to multiple interpretations),
perhaps he’s drawing a contrast between his own hasty action and the patient
response of the landowner to his tenants in the parable of the vineyard that
starts chapter 12. The owner in the parable created all the necessary
conditions for growth and then waited until the season came (12:2) before
trying to collect his share of the vineyard’s proceeds. He sent multiple
messengers before he finally sent his son.
It won’t be too much longer before the tenants kill the
beloved son. In the meantime, however, all is not lost. One scribe manages to
get it right. Perhaps there’s hope for the religious authorities after all. The
scribe hears Jesus’ summary of the law (otherwise known as the great
commandment – i.e. love God and love your neighbor as yourself) and agrees with
him. Jesus’ response to this scribe: “You are not far from the kingdom of God”
(12:34).
What do you think? What teaching here inspires you? What
confuses you? Click on “comments” below and add your thoughts!
Three times "the crowd" is with Jesus, while chief priest, scribes, elders, Pharisees, Herodians, and Sadducees are against him. A divided society!
ReplyDeleteBut also--one scribe is "not far from the kingdom of God" (12:34.
The fig tree is my big issue too! "Out of character?" I can't figure out a reason for it or contrive an explanation except to say, Jesus, was human too, stubbed his toe once in a while and cursed... "Damn it all to hell," was my next door neighbor's curse. I used to hear him as a boy. My mother told me that it was bad to say that. But in a sense, this is what I hear in this fig story. Hmmm.
ReplyDelete