Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Chapters 13-14 - Wake Up


Maybe they’re following his advice for once. In chapter 13, Jesus tells his disciples what’s going to happen to them if they continue to follow him. They’ll be handed over to councils, beaten, and brought to trial. Brother will betray brother. This is exactly what happens to Jesus in the next chapter. If the authorities have already come for Jesus, how much longer before they come for his friends? Maybe the disciples took the “little apocalypse” of Mark 13 seriously and fled as he directed them (13:14). He tells them flat out that they will all become deserters (14:27). They deny it, of course, but within moments of his arrest we’re told that “all of them deserted him and fled” (14:50).

Chapter 13 is puzzling for many of us, separated as we are from the original hearers by an ocean, a culture, and a language – not to mention by two millennia. Yet the wording here is pretty common for apocalyptic literature of its time. In this genre, the end is near and all is lost but for direct divine intervention. Our human efforts and good intentions won’t cut it; only God can make a difference now.

We’re not sure what “the desolating sacrilege” is that Jesus mentions in 13:14; Mark assumes that his audience knows, though. Perhaps it was too politically dangerous to say aloud. Whatever is to come (be it judgment or salvation or both), it’s foreshadowed by what happens to Jesus in the chapters ahead. Perhaps that’s part of why Jesus says that “this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place” (13:30). What will happen later in its fullness begins here.

Of course, the major piece of advice Jesus offers in these chapters is ignored completely. Twice he tells the disciples to “be alert” (13:23, 13:33). Four times he tells them to “keep awake” (13:35, 13:37; 14:34, 14:38). Yet three times in chapter 14, he goes to them in the Garden and finds them asleep. The only one who has managed to stay awake is Judas. We’re told that the chief priests and scribes know better than to arrest Jesus in the daylight, when the crowds might object; Judas arranges it so they can arrest him secretly.

Only the time for secrets is over. At the trial, the religious authorities ask Jesus point blank if he is the Messiah. His response, for once, is unequivocal: “I am” (14:62). Meanwhile, Peter hopes that he can keep up the secrecy a little while longer. He hides in the outer darkness of the courtyard and hopes that he can follow without cost. But the secret is out; he’s spotted and called out as a follower of Jesus not once or twice, but three times. Finally, the cock crows a second time, and all of Peter’s attempts at secrecy and self-delusion are exposed. He remembers Jesus’ words, breaks down and weeps.

Consider the group gathered for the Last Supper – betrayers, deniers, deserters all. Jesus knows this full well and gives them his body and blood anyway. In the words of hymn writer Isaac Watts, “love so amazing, so divine, demands my soul, my life, my all.” 

3 comments:

  1. Approaching the future, isn’t the Lord’s Supper central (14:22-25)? Passover, an important Jewish observance, is reborn to serve the new purpose of living connection with the Jesus who was crucified and the Christ who has risen and lived. Isn’t this Last Supper a threshold to a new way of being?

    We have no clue about Judas’ motive. Is this a gap in the record, so to speak, or does it say something about the nature of evil?

    And has Judas betrayed Jesus as part of a divinely-ordained plan, or of his own free will, or somehow both? In 14:21 Jesus seems to say both, and clearly points toward a bad destiny for Judas.

    The disciples—are they not exhibiting the frailty of ordinary humans? Even Jesus in Gethsemane prayed “remove this cup.” (14:36)

    The young man who ran off naked—is part of the story lost—or is this a parabolic mini-narrative needing more informed interpretation than I can give it? (14:51-52)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am with Ken; what is the man running off naked all about? But what used to bother me until this very recent reading is the comment about selling the ointment for the poor. "You will always have the poor with you and you can show them kindness whenever you wish."

    Kindness toward one (in this case, Jesus) need not be seen as unkindness towards others ("the poor"). Kindness can be applied liberally whenever and for whomever.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Jude about the ointment. Jesus was unique, and if you understand and accept his uniqueness you will show heartfelt mercy and generosity toward the poor--as in the Hebrew scriptures that Jesus had available in his time on earth.

    As to the naked youth, when I studied the OT twenty yrs ago there were two glib interpretations. (1) The naked youth was the rich young man who earlier had declined to give away his possessions in order to be saved.(10:17-22) Perhaps he had seen the error of his ways, kept only his cloak, and now loses it too. (2) The story is a fragment; too much is missing; and in its nakedness it seems out of place. These explanations seem too easy.

    Perhaps the young man wore no undergarments because the commotion suddenly rousted him from sleep, and he threw something on rapidly. I think it more of a stretch to think that if he had given possessions to the poor,he gave away all his underwear!

    Why not read this action-narrative as a parable, an apparently simple story with deep teaching? The event happens just after Jesus is seized and the disciples had run off (apparently without being grabbed at by the high priest's enforcers), and just before Jesus is taken before the authorities. The young man escapes arrest by agents of those bent on Jesus' death. He doesn't desert, he escapes after being grabbed. He is a refugee from illegitimate authority. Sometimes the cost of freedom is to lose even the little you thought you had.

    One commentary suggests OT connections (there are plenty of OT connections in the gospels). ..."Amos 2.16, ‘and he who is courageous among the mighty will flee away naked in that day’. But it is not likely that he could be seen, or would see himself, as one of the mighty. More likely might be Genesis 3.7, 10, 11 where Adam realised he was naked before God." Some have suggested that the young man was the author/witness for the gospel of Mark.

    I find no answer--except that there are no throwaway lines in Mark's tightly-constructed text. Perhaps we are being given a foretaste of the "terror and amazement" that seized the three women when they discovered the empty tomb. Something out of the world and out of time happened to them, more frightening than the grabbing hands of the stooges sent by the high priest. The young man's escape, leaving the stooges with just his outer cloak, may prepare us for that moment at the tomb when the women experience the impossible, the uncanny, and are frightened beyond fright. (I amconvinced by my favorite scholar that the best sources for Mark end abruptly when the three women were profoundly shocked and "said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid." (16:8)

    ReplyDelete